Filed under: Transportation Alternatives, HUMMER, Mercedes Benz
| # | Blogger | Posts | Cmts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sam Abuelsamid | 109 | 15 |
| 2 | Jeremy Korzeniewski | 106 | 1 |
| 3 | Sebastian Blanco | 93 | 11 |
| 4 | Xavier Navarro | 32 | 0 |
| 5 | Domenick Yoney | 27 | 0 |
| 6 | Chris Shunk | 9 | 0 |
| 7 | Chris Paukert | 2 | 0 |
| 8 | Dan Roth | 2 | 0 |
| 9 | Frank Filipponio | 2 | 0 |
| 10 | Damon Lavrinc | 1 | 0 |
| 11 | Jonathon Ramsey | 1 | 0 |
| 12 | Noah Joseph | 1 | 0 |
kers breaking ScrapCar ToyotaPrius ChevroletVolt ChevyVolt prius TeslaMotors hydrogen audi ZeroMotorcycles ElectricCar TTXGP TeslaModelS ElectricMotorcycle ShanghaiMotorShow tesla lithium-ion NissanEv toyota PlugInHybrid ElectricMotorcycles Greenlings ElectricCars doe brammo ElectricVehicle NissanElectricCar ElonMusk IsleOfMan ethanol featured gm TeslaRoadster HydrogenFuelCell volkswagen Plug-inHybrid 2010Prius CashForClunkers NewYork cafe 2010ToyotaPrius SaeWorldCongress ElectricVehicles mercedes-benz mercedes hybrid obama nissan renault
MORE ON AOL AUTOS: Car Loans | Auto Insurance | Certified Used Cars | Car Reviews | Car Buying Tips | Car Safety | Car Audio | Auto Repair
AOL AutosAll contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
AutoblogGreen is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
TG 5:40PM (11/03/2007)
And with reference to Canada.. consider,
The Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Association wants to look like enviro-good guys.
Debunking Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers Assn. 4/5 propaganda ad ; Page A7 National Post October 30th 2007
*We Have a Plan to Do More*
*New Technologies. We*ve introduced 70 new green technologies since 2005.
So much fluff..
A sad waste of Big PR money.
TonyGuitar.blogspot.com
Reply
Michael Wendell 7:07PM (11/03/2007)
Did AutoBlogGreen just call this a "BMW Smart Car?" C'mon guys, we expect better from you.
m.
Reply
Lascelles Linton 7:43PM (11/03/2007)
Michael, He, he :D Sorry about that. Corrected.
Reply
Snowdog 8:49PM (11/03/2007)
That is a review? Some chick likes the Smart for no real rational reason. She also says not to compare it to anything else. Presumably because we would realize you can buy a Honda Fit that is better in just about every way possible.
She confuses power with top speed. "The 135km/h top speed is more than enough power". Uh yeah...
It has 40 HP and does 0-60 in 20 seconds for cripes sake, that is not enough power.
I think TTAC has more credibility.
Oh and it was $26000. Bahahahahhahahaha!
Reply
Mirko 5:03AM (11/04/2007)
This is the OLD smart fortwo, not the model that will be coming to the US.
Reply
BHendrix 6:20AM (11/04/2007)
The reviewer does not like the Smart for 'no rational reason.' She specifically mentions its fuel economy, its small size for parking, and that the car is something unique. She was also surprised by its interior room, its performance on the highway, and criticizes the transmission's automatic function for being harsh.
The $26,000 price is for a special edition trim called 'Nightrun.' Regular Smart cars start around $16,500 CDN. This too was mentioned in the video.
It seem that some people have such a difficult time with this woman's opinion, that they have to distort her views and dismiss her as just 'some chick.' Sad.
Reply
Snowdog 6:13PM (11/05/2007)
I dismiss her for saying things like 135KM/h is more than enough power. She seems a tad clueless about cars, to be reviewing cars. That looked more like a smart car advert than a review.
Reply
Joseph 2:43PM (4/09/2008)
Who cares. She is hot and has a nice voice. I could not get a car with an 83 mph top speed. I will surely be run over in Miami, FL.
Reply
zahipedia 4:49AM (10/21/2008)
just like to say amazing........................
Reply